McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

« Final Rule: Changes To Practice for Continued Examination Filings, Patent Applications Containing Patentably Indistinct Claims, and Examination of Claims in Patent Applications | Main | Around the Horn: Continuation Rule Changes »

Aug 21, 2007

Comments

I'd like to see them respond to some of Mr. Boundy's questions.

Is there a way to submit questions in advance? There are many well thought out situations for which they might need a little time to prepare answers.

"Is there a way to submit questions in advance? There are many well thought out situations for which they might need a little time to prepare answers."

Isn't it clear they just don't care?

Instead of "Clarity Moves Innovation," the title should really be, "Stupidity Stifles Innovation."

I work with lots of small entities and now I am going to have to explain to them that they now have to fork up $5,000+ to file an appeal or abandon their application.

I really don't think the people at the USPTO realize the significance of what they have done.

I have an advance question for poindexter in the rules dept. at the PTO!

Can you see the smoke rising from Mr T's head? OOOOOOoooo I'm mad.

Give me back my dough back for the claims I filed above 25! You owe me sucka!

I believe that you can get your money back if you decide to cancel claims rather than foolishly prepare the Document of Doom (aka an ESD).

I like the "compliance" section 1.78(f) best...hahaha.

No sh@t Merc, LOL, guilty until proven innocent!

No question, this will be very expensive for applicants. Also, just "policing" all of the applications that don't have first Office Actions will either (1) require a lot of time/money, or (2) not happen until the PTO sends out an "inadvertant" notice, at which time it will require additional time/money...

Does anyone think the PTO will actually be able to implement its own rules properly? I am afraid to see what's going to come out of OIPE in the coming months.

The PTO's webcast notice reads as follows:

Operating System and Browser Requirements:

Browsers: Internet Explorer 6.0 or 7.0
Windows Media Player 9.0 or higher is required.
You MUST be able to access Windows Media files within your firewall in order to participate.
The live event will not be accessible to Mac users

Thus, both Macintosh and Linux users are being intentionally excluded, despite the widespread availability of webcast systems that are cross-platform (and even, gasp! open source.) (Note that Microsoft has not released IE above 5 for the Macintosh, nor has it released WMP 9+, so this is an affirmative decision to exclude, and not just some unintended side-effect.)

I emailed the PTO asking for an alternative access, but have not received the courtesy of a reply.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Search & Share


  • Share


  • The Web Patent Blog

Patently-O Jobs

Subscribe


  • Patently-O is the most popular patent law blog and a daily read for over fifteen thousand patent law professionals from every major innovative corporation, IP Law Firm and world patent office. Click the link above to receive an automatic Patently-O e-mail each morning with the freshest posts.

Recent Posts

Author

Terms of Use & Disclaimer

  • Terms of Use

  • Patently-O on Facebook
    Connect with Patently-O readers.

  •