McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

« Appellate Standing Does Not Require Patentee | Main | GlaxoSmithKline vs. Dudas: An Attempt to Stop Implemention of PTO Prosecution Rules »

Oct 13, 2007

Comments

Our count is about 42, that is more than a handful to pass. And then they face holds and a filibuster.

It looks to me like the Coalition for Patent fairness & PIRACY is going to get their tails kicked on the Hill and then they will continue to get their tails kicked in court for blatant theft of other's intellectual property. I am sure that at some point most of them will learn to change their ways. Well perhaps except for RIM, Bodog, Vonage, and Apple :) Another decade or so of attitude adjustments should get even the worst players past corporate adolescence.

Ronald J. Riley,
President - www.PIAUSA.org - RJR at PIAUSA.org
Washington, DC
Direct (202) 318-1595 - 9 am to 9 pm EST.

The Coalition for Patent Fairness has a map with its members' locations. Curiously, the map includes Ontario, Canada. On October 5, 2007, I downloaded all the company information from the map. Ontario's entry was:

"Research in Motion
Mississauga, Ontario
Research in Motion
Ottawa, Ontario
Research in Motion
Waterloo, Ontario"

http://www.patentfairness.org/about_the_coalition/our_members.cfm

CPF has since apparently deleted that information from their site, but you can still find Research in Motion by clicking on Texas, and in this letter to Congress linked in question 30 of the NIPRA quiz:

http://judiciary.house.gov/Media/PDFS/CPF070905.pdf

Ya think they're trying to fool the public, or Congress? Perhaps next week Ontario will be wiped off their map....

http://www.nipra.org/action.html

Dennis wrote : " S.1145 is still hanging around the senate waiting for a couple of hours on the floor where it can be passed without debate"

What happened with this? I assume that it did NOT get the requisite 60 votes??
Am I correct, or can the proponents still try to rustle up the 60 votes?

Am I correct in my assumption that (i) they did not get 60 votes (ii) they cannot pass this bill this year without debate, and opponents can now fillibuster????

Could someone answer please ? Thanks

Interesting fact about Countrywide, a member of the coalition for patent "fairness":

Countrywide under investigation
By Kathy M. Kristof | 8:41 p.m.
CEO Angelo Mozilo sold $145 million as the company's shares went into a tailspin.

(from the LaTimes)

Why do people never scrutinize those "voices" calling for "reform"? they're not exactly as "white as snow" - ask the European anti-trust enforcers about M$, Intel, etc.

"The Coalition for Patent Fairness has a map with its members' locations. Curiously, the map includes Ontario, Canada."

CPF has now wiped Ontario off the map of public perception (though it is still the invisible driving force of the coalition). We at NIPRA have maintained an archival copy of the record for all who are interested to see:

http://www.nipra.org/coalition.html

Shame on you, CPF, for playing games with America for $$$ sake.

"Accordingly, whatever you have said in the dark shall be heard in the light, and what you have whispered in the inner rooms shall be proclaimed upon the housetops."

The comments to this entry are closed.

Search & Share


  • Share


  • The Web Patent Blog

Patently-O Jobs

Subscribe


  • Patently-O is the most popular patent law blog and a daily read for over fifteen thousand patent law professionals from every major innovative corporation, IP Law Firm and world patent office. Click the link above to receive an automatic Patently-O e-mail each morning with the freshest posts.

Recent Posts

Author

Recent Comments

Terms of Use & Disclaimer

  • Terms of Use

  • Patently-O on Facebook
    Connect with Patently-O readers.

  •