Home | Subscribe | Post a Job | Advertise | Contact
« Subsidiary's Lost Profits Do Not Translate to Lost Profit Damages for Parent Patent Holder |
| Ex Parte Reexamination Statistics I »
Posted on Jun 05, 2008 at 01:30 AM in Bits and Bytes, Design Patent | Permalink
| Save to del.icio.us
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
D398,879? Superior Merchandise Co., Inc. v. M.G.I. Wholesale, Inc., 2000 WL 322779 (E.D.La. 2000)
Anon E. Moose |
Jun 05, 2008 at 01:51 PM
That sofa is really distinctive.
Malcolm Mooney |
Jun 05, 2008 at 02:00 PM
Not to mention Design Patent No. 321,347, to Tony Colida. See Dennis' earlier post at http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2004/12/mobile_phone_ma.html.
Colida sued several more times with the same patent after losing these 3 suits. Does anybody know the record for number of separate infringent cases lost, based on the same patent?
Jun 05, 2008 at 02:50 PM
Does anyone have any litigation info regarding the utility knife patents?
Jun 06, 2008 at 03:54 PM
The comments to this entry are closed.
Jason Rantanen, Associate ProfessorUniversity of IowaCollege of LawSSRN Articles
Occasional guest posts by IP practitioners and academics