« Subsidiary's Lost Profits Do Not Translate to Lost Profit Damages for Parent Patent Holder | Main | Ex Parte Reexamination Statistics I »
Jun 05, 2008
Comments
The comments to this entry are closed.
Subscribe
Patently-O is the most popular patent law blog and a daily read for over fifteen thousand patent law professionals from every major innovative corporation, IP Law Firm and world patent office. Click the link above to receive an automatic Patently-O e-mail each morning with the freshest posts.
Recent Posts
- More False Marking: Forest Group v. Bon Tool
- Office Actions
- Ranking of Patent Law BLogs
- False Marking Case Dismissed
- Mexican Yellow Bean Patent Finally Cooked
- The Pope on Patents
- Sanctions for Frivolous Lawsuit: Fraser v. High Liner Foods
- The Changing Nature Inventing: Collaborative Inventing
- Inter Partes Reexamination Statistics
- En Banc Federal Circuit To Rehear Tafas v. Doll
- Ex Parte Reexamination Pendency
- Happy Fourth-of-July
- The Flawed Nature of the False Marking Statute
- Assistant Examiners and Patent Term Adjustment
- Bits and Bites: Voting Again
- Dropping Claim Counts
- Centocor v. Abbott: $1.67 Billion Jury Verdict
- Prelim: The Association Between Grant Rate and Pre-Filing Searches
- Effect of a Stipulated Dismissal
- Evidence Based Prosecution: The Status of Applications Filed 4 ½ Years Ago
- Timeline of the BPAI Backlog
- Bits and Bytes: In the News
- Patently-O Bits and Bytes
- Understanding the Role of the Board of Patent Appeals: Ex Parte Rejection Rates on Appeal
- Bits and Bytes: Kappos & Dudas
- Understanding the Role of the Board of Patent Appeals: Ex Parte Rejection Rates on Appeal
- David Kappos: Next USPTO Director
- Preliminary Injunctions and Obviousness in Design Patent Law
- Appealing BPAI Rejections to the Federal Circuit
- Bits and Bytes: Data, Damages & Deferred Examination
Categories
- Academic Studies
- Accelerated Examination
- All Elements
- Amicus Brief
- Anticipation
- Articles and Publications
- Attorney Fees
- Best Mode
- Bits and Bytes
- Blogroll
- Book Review
- BPAI
- Business Developments
- CAFC
- Certificate of Correction
- Chemical
- Claim Construction
- Claim Drafting Tips
- Conference or CLE
- Contributory Infringement
- Damages
- Declaratory Judgment
- Design Patent
- Dissent
- District Court
- Doctrine of Equivalents
- EFiling
- En Banc
- Enablement
- Fees
- First Sale / Exhaustion
- Gaming
- Graham Factors
- Guest Post
- Indefinite
- Inducement
- Inequitable Conduct
- Infringement
- Injunctions
- Interference
- Invalidity
- Inventors
- Inventorship
- ITC
- Jurisdiction
- Law Firm Practice
- Lear Doctrine
- License
- Local Rules
- Means Plus Function
- Medical Device
- Method Claims
- Motivation to Combine
- Obviousness
- On Sale
- Patent Cases 2004
- Patent Cases 2005
- Patent Cases 2006
- Patent Cases 2007
- Patent Cases 2008
- Patent Cases 2009
- Patent Legislation
- Patent Prosecution
- Patent Q&A
- Patentable Subject Matter
- Pharma
- PHOSITA
- Post Grant Review
- Priority Rights
- Procedure
- Provisional Patent Application
- Public Use
- Reexamination
- Reissue
- Revival
- Settlement
- Software
- State Immunity
- Statutory Construction
- Summary Judgment
- Supreme Court
- Takings
- Teaching Away
- TipCast
- Tools
- Trade Secret
- Transnational
- USPTO News
- Vitiation
Friends
- ABA blawgs
- Coby Nixon
- Delaware IP
- Donoghue
- ELS
- Fire of Genius
- Green Patents
- Heinze
- Inventive Step
- IP Biz
- IP Kat
- IP Watch
- Law School Book Docket
- Mark Walters
- MCSmith
- Nipper
- Orange Book Blog
- Patent Baristas
- Patent Docs
- Patent Prospectors
- Philip Brooks
- PLI Blog
- Prof Goldman
- Promote The Progress
- Reichel
- SCOTUS Blog
- Spicy IP
- The Patent Law Journal
- Truth on the Market
Author
- Dennis Crouch,
Associate Professor
University of Missouri
School of Law - Short Articles:
- Preferred Blog Citation: Dennis Crouch, [Title of Post], Patently-O, [permalink URL] (Date).
Recent Comments
- Noise above Law on The Pope on Patents
- Noise above Law on False Marking Case Dismissed
- edstirling on Office Actions
- Lionel Hutz on The Pope on Patents
- American Cowboy on The Pope on Patents
- Noise above Law on False Marking Case Dismissed
- Lionel Hutz on False Marking Case Dismissed
- BV on False Marking Case Dismissed
- Noise above Law on The Pope on Patents
- Noise above Law on False Marking Case Dismissed
- yoda on Office Actions
- Fred on The Pope on Patents
- BV on False Marking Case Dismissed
- Fred Smith on More False Marking: Forest Group v. Bon Tool
- Maggie Kohls on Mexican Yellow Bean Patent Finally Cooked
- curious on Office Actions
- Frip Chissom on Ranking of Patent Law BLogs
- what's up bitches? on Office Actions
- curious on Office Actions
- 6 on Office Actions
Terms of Use & Disclaimer
- Terms of Use
- Patently-O on Facebook
Connect with Patently-O readers. -
-
DC;
D398,879? Superior Merchandise Co., Inc. v. M.G.I. Wholesale, Inc., 2000 WL 322779 (E.D.La. 2000)
Posted by: Anon E. Moose | Jun 05, 2008 at 02:51 PM
That sofa is really distinctive.
LOL.
Posted by: Malcolm Mooney | Jun 05, 2008 at 03:00 PM
Not to mention Design Patent No. 321,347, to Tony Colida. See Dennis' earlier post at http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2004/12/mobile_phone_ma.html.
Colida sued several more times with the same patent after losing these 3 suits. Does anybody know the record for number of separate infringent cases lost, based on the same patent?
Posted by: BigGuy | Jun 05, 2008 at 03:50 PM
Does anyone have any litigation info regarding the utility knife patents?
Posted by: DAG | Jun 06, 2008 at 04:54 PM