Cold War Museum v. Cold War Air Museum (Fed. Cir. 2009)
In 2004, the appellant registered the service mark THE COLD WAR MUSEUM under Section 2(f) after providing evidence that the mark had acquired distinctiveness through "substantially exclusive and continuous use in commerce for at least the previous five years."
Three years later, the Air Museum filed a cancellation proceeding. In that proceeding, the TTAB cancelled the mark based on its finding that the mark was merely descriptive of the service being provided.
On appeal, the Federal Circuit reversed TTAB and instead held that the party seeking to cancel the mark had not overcome the presumption "the registered mark has acquired distinctiveness."
A mark registered on the Principal Register is presumed to be valid. . . . [T]he presumption of validity that attaches to a Section 2(f) registration includes a presumption that the registered mark has acquired distinctiveness. To rebut this presumption, a party seeking to cancel a Section 2(f) registration must produce sufficient evidence for the Board to conclude, in view of the entire record in the cancellation proceeding, that the party has rebutted the mark's presumption of acquired distinctiveness by a preponderance of the evidence.
TTAB had refused to consider the mark-holder's originally submitted evidence of distinctiveness. On appeal, the Federal Circuit also held that evidentiary ruling to be in error.
[T]he Board acknowledged that the applicant had submitted evidence of acquired distinctiveness during prosecution. However, the Board decided that it could not consider this evidence because the Cold War Museum did not resubmit the evidence in the cancellation. This was error. The unambiguous language of 37 C.F.R. § 2.122(b) provides that the entire file of the registration at issue is automatically part of the record, without any action necessary by the parties. Therefore, the evidence of the mark's acquired distinctiveness submitted during prosecution was automatically part of the record before the Board, and the Board was required to consider this evidence in determining whether Air Museum had met its burden of proving a lack of acquired distinctiveness by a preponderance of the evidence.
rules indicate that the "evidence of record" in an opposition includes the entire registration file history .







"THE COLD WAR MUSEUM"
Never heard of it until now. Is that where they keep Reagan's brain?
Posted by: Malcolm Mooney | Nov 05, 2009 at 02:38 PM
The Cold War Museum I believe is run or was started by Gary Powers son....Gary Powers Jr.
MM - I hope you have heard of him at least.
Posted by: Fed Up Old Guy | Nov 05, 2009 at 04:47 PM
Seems to me Reagan ended the cold war Mooney. A heck of a lot more than you will EVER do - not counting, of course your lengthy resume of indecent acts with the corpse of Che Guevara's mule. I read on DRUDGE about a guy who just got three years in jail for indecent liberties with a horse - do you like horses too Mooney?
Posted by: SomeoneWhoKnows | Nov 05, 2009 at 06:15 PM
Has someone already trademarked THE IRAQ WAR MUSEUM? Or the THE WAR ON DRUGS MUSEUM?
Posted by: Malcolm Mooney | Nov 05, 2009 at 06:52 PM
O sht.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/space/20091105/sc_space/devicelikestartrekreplicatormightflyonspacestation
Posted by: 6 | Nov 05, 2009 at 09:59 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WrWHwHuWrzk
Posted by: 6 | Nov 05, 2009 at 10:05 PM
On the other hand as far as patents are concerned, isn't it trending towards a reduced presumption of validity.
Posted by: curious | Nov 06, 2009 at 12:13 AM
"Reagan ended the cold war" That Republican canard never gets old.
Posted by: Lionel Hutz | Nov 06, 2009 at 06:42 AM
If not Reagan, then who?
Posted by: Just an ordinary inventor(TM) | Nov 06, 2009 at 08:43 AM
JAOI - Why Messiabama, of course! He's responsible for everything good, even when it's double-plus-ungood (in which case, it's still good)!
I mean, aren't you better off now than you were 11 months ago???!!!
Of course, the recession would have last pretty much the same length whether a republican or democrat was president, but at least this way we've tripled the national debt . . . (what, that isn't a good thing . . . oh yeah) . . . um, hey, isn't that a squirrel on the White House lawn.
Good job, Messiabama and the dum-o-cRATs (remember when the dum-o-cRATs cried because the republican commercial showed "RAT" before showing the whole word "democrat".)
Posted by: Ha ha ha | Nov 06, 2009 at 09:43 AM
i was easily better off within the first ten days of his term, so much so that i started the nobel peace prize nomination process for him
Posted by: hindsight from the future | Nov 06, 2009 at 10:10 AM
A simple google of "COLD WAR MUSEUM" shows what seems to be several entities using that mark. Appellant needs to aggresssively protect their mark (e.g. sue all other users) or risk losing that mark.
The 04-Feb-2003 trademark application for THE COLD WAR MUSEUM says the first use was July 13, 1996. A google books search for "COLD WAR MUSEUM" before July 1996 shows generic use of the term going back to at least 1969.
Posted by: Steveball | Nov 06, 2009 at 10:52 AM
""Reagan ended the cold war" That Republican canard never gets old. "
And the old canard that Obama is an American citizen, or that Lincoln "freed the slaves" never gets old either
Is there any doubt that Mooney and Hutz are the same angry little liberal?
Posted by: NOT Che Guevara | Nov 06, 2009 at 11:03 AM
Hey I got the Nobel Prize, trust me, it is no big deal...
Posted by: posing as Al Gore | Nov 06, 2009 at 11:05 AM
What I'm curious about is: is the ratio of wingnut patent prosecutors who comment here abnormally high because of the software troll/E.D.Texas angle, or i there just one genuinely tweaked puppy who yaps like crazy ever time St. Ronnie is mentioned?
Posted by: Malcolm Mooney | Nov 06, 2009 at 11:35 AM
JAOI
The Soviet Union collapsed under the weight of it's poor economic policies, the primary of which was central planning. Some market basis is required to properly evaluate the needs and wants of a community.
Did Reagan accelerate the collapse by his arms escalation? Sure. But the idea that Reagan brought down the USSR is absurdly naive.
Posted by: Lionel Hutz | Nov 06, 2009 at 11:37 AM
Dear Lionel,
My question was:
"If not Reagan, then who?"
Let me put it this way:
Who deserves more credit than President Reagan?
Posted by: Just an ordinary inventor(TM) | Nov 06, 2009 at 11:55 AM
"On the other hand as far as patents are concerned, isn't it trending towards a reduced presumption of validity."
No Mooney, its not.
Posted by: TwoCents | Nov 06, 2009 at 12:03 PM
Mooney cries all the time...
Its no big deal.
Posted by: Mooney'sMama | Nov 06, 2009 at 12:52 PM
JAOI,
Primarily, the Soviet Union itself. The party leaders ran the union into the ground.
Posted by: Lionel Hutz | Nov 06, 2009 at 07:54 PM
Not Che Guevara,
Thanks for identifying yourself as a birther wingnut. BTW, where was McCain born?
Posted by: Lionel Hutz | Nov 06, 2009 at 07:56 PM
"wingnut" is like "patent troll" - designed to attempt to end legitimate inquiry.
Posted by: DumbItDown | Nov 09, 2009 at 12:09 PM
McCain was born in the CZ.
No, not Czechoslovakia -- the Canal Zone.
Posted by: Cert Denied | Nov 09, 2009 at 05:50 PM