CAFC: Distinguishing Feature of Invention Reflected in Claim Construction

PatentlyOImage020Boss Control v. Bombardier and Sports Cars, Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2005).

In a dispute over a power interrupter, the CAFC affirmed a summary judgment of noninfringement, finding that the patentee had given a special limiting definition to a disputed claim term during prosecution.

Specifically, the court looked to how the patentee had distinguished the invention from prior art and incorporated that distinguishing feature into the claim language.

File Attachment: Boss Control.pdf (56 KB)